Hello
Sitebrand > Archive by category 'RSS Marketing'
1 2 3 ... 14

Sitebrand Talks

352 Posts

Ox equals personalization

Posted by Kevin Butler January 5, 2009

Hello and happy 2009 to all Sitebrand frequenters. Thanks for kicking off the new year by reading our blogs – we appreciate it and love all the comments that come with blogging. According to Chinese calendars, 2009 is the year of the Ox. So just how are oxen relevant to anything e-Commerce you ask? Keep reading to find out…

So apparently the United States is in a recession and has been for some time. Lately, I’ve been so immersed in various other things and may have missed out on such news. However, as sad as that may sound, I am up to date in things like Twitter (totally the new RSS of 2009, don’t you know), Amazon’s massive holiday sales spike, Chinese new year’s, terrible year end lists and of course, personalization. I swear my introductions are getting longer, but this is all going somewhere, I promise.

A recession, eh? Is that the thing that makes companies shrink budgets – more specifically, shrink marketing budgets? From talking to some peers, it seems a big trend for 2009 will see marketers finding cheap, inexpensive or free (the best kind) ways to promote and grow. I’m no genius, especially since I didn’t even know about this ‘recession thing’, but how does a company grow with limited/reduced budgets? While the aggressive side of me thinks there’s no time better than now to increase marketing budgets, I also understand the other side here – the responsible side of me, that is. And that could be why social media has and will continue to climb to the top of many marketers “definitely need to do/try that in 2009 lists”. I know, more lists at the beginning of a new year, but I digress.

You might be thinking: “social media is the buzz, but it’s not a proven revenue generator”. True and like all things, I’m sure social media will quickly evolve with that in mind over the next few years. Something to bare in mind here - social media is still very new and I don’t feel social media should be providing mass sales at this point. Mashable.com has a great survey about this, too. That’s where I see social media differently at this point – does it have to provide unassisted new sales, right now? I look at the Twitters, Facebooks, (etc…) as a part of the marketing mix, not an independent one. They will help the conversational aspect – a critical piece – with your customers and potential ones, but won’t act as the first and last points of contact to drive the sale.

Looking at this from an outside perspective, you can pay agencies, firms, specialists, etc… to run integrated social media campaigns, but it seems many companies are keeping it in-house. Whether financial reasoning or otherwise, marketers are taking notice of varying methods from big time companies like Southwest Airlines, Starbucks, Dell, all the way down to the mom and pop shops that are still around. And why not? They’ve done a great job reaching out to customers and speaking to them. Those familiar with my views from previous writings probably see this part coming: you’ve developed interest. You’ve cut through the mass and now they want to know more, so they return to your website, only to find generic messaging and content. Maverick and Iceman just called: they said mission failed – failed like the Detroit Lions historic no-win season. Back to my point, use social media to cut through the clutter, use personalization to get relevant. That’s a better 1-2 punch than Brady/Moss (from 2007, of course – sorry Lions fans). While you can have one without the other, the combined efforts are far greater than one on its own. Also, personalization is a better and more proven ROI effort than social media, as of writing this. Like all things internet these days, that could change in a hurry.

For a quick recap, I’ll leave you with an equation that should help demonstrate why personalization should be on your radar, why it makes sense in today’s economy and how it will help even the newest social media-ist get the message heard loud and clear, at the right time. Its not scientific, but I’m fairly sure it checks out…

1.    2009 = the year of the ox
2.    Oxen = methodical and detail oriented, yet have difficulty connecting with others (I swear I looked this up)
3.    Sitebrand = easily connects with specific audiences, sending relevance/targeted marketing campaigns
4.    Social media = easy way to speak directly to customers and is quickly becoming an integral part of all marketing plans (big and small)
5.    Year of personalization = 2009 (according to many, including me)

Therefore: 2009 is the year marketers/e-Commerce professionals must integrate social media efforts with Sitebrand’s personalization in order to deliver that 1-2 combo that your customers deserve.

Stay classy, internet.

1 comment Permalink

The traditional website is becoming de-centralized, as most traditional websites are fragmenting into hundreds of micro-footprints through blogs, social networks, newsgroups and multiple wholly owned properties. 

At the same time, the market at large is calling for online marketing management software to become centralized (see Forrester), so that more cohesive campaigns can be built, and disparate datasets can be merged together for better visibility.

 To quote a great Ottawa personality: Isn’t it ironic.

 I think the answer to this ironic situation is in another quote (and source of online flame wars) - “Web analytics is hard”.

 While it is definitely a legitimate hot-button and market requirement, a centralized online marketing suite is not a silver bullet.  There is no doubt that it is impossible to make decisions about current successes and future plans if you have fifteen sets of reports from fifteen disparate tools. 

 We deal with this on a day to day basis at Sitebrand.  If a customer uses us to personalize messages to a visitor from a particular affiliate with the goal of growing conversions, they now have three reports from three vendors, none of which connect, and all of which have different numbers.  Yikes.

 Given the aggressive adoption (and evangelization) of 2.0 technologies and marketing methods however, no online marketing suite will ever be able to solve problems out of the box.

 In five years from now, it might be effective to push a viral video out through RSS specifically to mobile browsers, with the hope that they click through the video to a Facebook widget created to have friends push coupons to your products to each other, which can be used online or in store.

 And I can promise you, even in five years there won’t be enough Red Bulls and developers in the world to build transparent reporting around that initiative.

 All that is going to happen is that the leading thinkers in the space are going to say “Online Marketing Suites are hard”.  And they will be right.

 Build a plan, work the plan, show the plan worked.  We are still struggling with it as we come to the end of Commerce 1.0, and we will keep struggling with it until we standardize on ‘what should be done’.

 Perhaps this is a job  for the WAA standards committee.  They are doing a great job in standardizing the common terms in analytics so that the industry stays on the same page.

An interesting next step for them might include a practical document standardizing what a team of web practitioners should be doing for procedures, tools usage, documentation etc.  Better yet, including a scoring system so that readers could self-evaluate. Think Gartner maturity model, but for eCommerce. 

 The moral of the story is that there is no piece of software, in present or future,  that will help execute on a plan when no plan has been built.  I think if more web teams knew where they ranked based on holistic best practices, they could take some of the ‘hard’ out of web 1.0, and be prepared to reap more value than hype from the next generation of technologies and practices.

 Cheers,

 Jim

1 comment Permalink

Many people think RSS and email are alike - or at least direct competitors. However, there are fundamental differences that can make the two channels allies, and not enemies.

The Technology Marketing blog does a great job of explaining the differences. Specifically the first one is the most important (In my opinion):

RSS is a ‘pull’ technology, not a ‘push’. The delivery methodology is at the convenience of the customer and not the marketer. As such, time sensitive or must-see content may be better off being delivered via email than RSS. It’s easy to measure subscribes and unsubscribes via email, but it’s not as easy with RSS unless you have 1 to 1 feeds.

People read your email feed whenever and where ever they want, whereas email you are shoving it right in the inbox. Both work, both have their places, but they aren’t the same.

Keep reading…

0 comments Permalink

What’s this RSS stuff all about?

Posted by Kelly Rusk October 19, 2006

So in September’s Expresso e-bulletin, we focussed on RSS & email. It included a quick survey that asked our subscribers about RSS. It wasn’t too surprising that 54% of our readers didn’t even know what RSS is since it is still in its early adoption phase. I’ll be honest, before starting this blog I didn’t know a whole lot about it either, and although I do tend to be on the cutting edge of technology I admit that new things still scare me.

I’ve also noticed through the magic of analytics, that many of you, our blog readers, don’t use RSS, so I want to take a minute for a quick explanation and encourage those who don’t know to at least learn just a little about it.

RSS stands for either Rich Site Summary (usually reserved for the techies) or Really Simple Syndication (for the rest of us) and it’s a powerful tool that very basi
cally alerts people (through a specialized reader or even email) when new content is published. Content can be anything really, but it’s commonly used for news, blogs and podcasts.

You use RSS by downloading or signing up for a reader (I use newsgator) and then when you see this symbol on a site or blog:

you can click on it and paste the URL into your reader to subscribe.(or commonly you’ll be directed to a page where you can select your reader and it’s added automatically) then all you have to do is check your reader whenever you feel like it.

But if that sounds complicated or labour intensive, you can always subscribe by email (being the email junkies we are, we’ve included a signup box over to the right) and you’ll get an email up to once a day with all the new content.

I hope I’ve said enough to pique your interest to find out more. At the very least I hope I didn’t make it sound to confusing!

0 comments Permalink
1 2 3 ... 14