Hello
Sitebrand > Archive by category 'Web Analytics'
1 2 3 ... 14

Sitebrand Talks

365 Posts

The future of online marketing

Posted by Kevin Butler December 2, 2008

Good Tuesday morning to all Sitebrand blog readers. To our US friends, happy late Thanksgiving and to our Canadian friends…well… Thanksgiving was more than a month ago. I think that’s around the last time our Ottawa Senators won, too.

With Black Friday/Cyber Monday unofficially marking the beginning of website lockdown from now, through to the New Year, we’ll continue to see the efforts of online marketing at its finest, from months of planning and upgrades in various internet marketing tools.

So with that kind of build up, I was curious to see some of the marketing strategies of e-tailers over the long weekend. Unfortunately, nothing stood out … kind of like those new NHL 3rd jerseys.

Walmart was offering changing specials as the weekend progressed (something a shiny new Segment&Serve from Sitebrand could do) and Starbucks was tweeting or twitting… or twittering or whatever it is we do on Twitter (look me up: kevin_butler).

This got me wondering; what will the internet be like in the future and how will it differ from 2008? From Eric Schmidt (super cool Google dude) to me (super cool Sitebrand guy with a rad blog), everyone has suggested personalization is the future of internet. But how personal are we talking? Will e-Commerce be so optimized that sites will be able to know accurate age ranges, eye colors and favorite Britney Spears songs? Or will all sites be issuing targeted messaging via content spaces? Actually, that’s not very futuristic at all. I happen to know a Canadian e-Commerce SaaS company that could have this integrated within hours, set for your electronic holiday rush.

But the point is, what do we expect online shopping to transform into? I agree with the notion that intelligent recommendations and relevant personalization will become the norm. But will shoppers be so bombarded with recommendations, new products or cross-sell efforts that conversion rates still suffer? I’ve always believed in the KISS principle and that less is more. Perhaps shopping cart optimization will become the new rage. But instead of peering into the future with flying cars and web4.0 causing problems, let’s focus on the now: 2009 and the year of personalization – don’t let me down, internet. If you are interested in personalization and want to know more or don’t see its value, send me a quick note. I’d love to hear more.

Let me know if you saw any cool/unique/totally wicked promotions or efforts that caught your eye this weekend. I’d love to hear some innovative strategies.

3 comments Permalink
feelbest.com

feelbest.com

For online stores like feelbest.com using Sitebrand’s Segment&Serve Web personalization technology, creating more relevant experiences is comparable to having a virtual sales assistant. The concept behind Web personalization is very much based on what consumers have come to expect from the traditional brick and mortar shopping experience. Consider the traditional brick and mortar store where a sales person
easily observes and responds to variousshopping behaviors and body language. If someone is a repeat customer, they get to know their buying habits. If someone is a new customer, they work to build a level
of trust by offering helpful suggestions, sharing information about a hassle-free return policy, showing the layout of the store and so on. If someone is looking at high end fashion apparel, they look to cross-sell high end accessories. If someone is looking at sale items, they show them all the sale areas and so on.

Understanding visitor intent

But move online and suddenly the visual cues are gone. However, thanks to Web analytics, there are other cues the online marketer can follow. From the moment a visitor arrives, there’s intent to do something – to research, to buy, to register etc. And every move is monitored through Web analytics. The bottom line is that every move a visitor makes tells a story – from how they arrive to what they click and how long they stay on any given page. If someone arrives using the keyword “sunscreen”, they’re looking for sunscreen. If a Web site responds appropriately by showing a selection sunscreen and the visitor clicks to learn more or buy, they are that much closer to buying. They are being guided through the sales funnel. But if they bounce out of the site before converting – either pre-checkout or during check-out – something went wrong. And it likely relates to lack of guidance and direction from the Web site.

Responding to classic e-commerce challenges

Feelbest.com is Canada’s largest online health and beauty aid store and it faces many of the classic ecommerce challenges, including low conversion rates. As such, it is always looking for innovative ways to convert a higher percentage of Web traffic into buyers. The company also wants to recognize and respond to visitors’ geolocations; especially in terms of seasonality trends associated with many of its product categories, such as sunscreen. And it wants to create a superior, personal online experience that makes feelbest.com the online retailer customers turn to when they can’t find what they need in a regular store. The company actively encourages customers to tell it what they are looking for, no matter how obscure it may seem. The retailer specializes in finding and offering hard to find health care and beauty aid products. “If there’s demand – even from just five or ten customers – and the product is available somewhere in the world, we’ll go directly to the manufacturer and make it available to our customers,” says Darrin Pickard, feelbest.com’s sales and marketing manager.

The need to convert more traffic into buyers

The retailer’s approach is quaintly reminiscent of the corner-store owner who would get to know his/her customers one person at a time and stock accordingly. Although this personal approach to serving customers is like those of days gone by, the scale of the operation is surely different. Products are shipped to clients around the world with roughly 65% heading to the US. That’s also the nub of the challenge: motivating feelbest.com to explore an alternative strategy for further customizing and personalizing the Web experience of all visitors. The explicit goal was to find a solution that would convert a higher percentage of new and repeat traffic into sales. “Back in the late 1990s, it was easier to stake your claim as a top online retailer. But today, it’s much more competitive and you can never be complacent,” says Pickard.

Changing each visitor’s experience in real-time

Feelbest.com chose Sitebrand with its promise of superior traffic conversion to literally change the experience of every visitor in real-time while on a Website. What the retailer particularly appreciated
about the Sitebrand solution was the extensive support provided to help get up and running with a customized solution quickly. “Sitebrand is like a natural extension to our marketing team,” says Pickard. “It’s not a one-strategy-fits-all approach. What Sitebrand does is analyze your traffic and provide you with customized solutions based on your business goals and what your customers are looking for.” In the case of feelbest.com, the Sitebrand solution resulted in recommendations for the type, placement and frequency of marketing campaigns to target specific customers and boost sales in specific product categories. In Pickard’s words, “I think any online retailer worth their salt knows you can’t mass market on the Web and expect to achieve success. As best you can, you must try to speak to each site visitor as an individual. When you show people you are interested in getting to know them, they’ll show interest back. It is “Customer Service 101” and we’ve seen this with the personalization campaigns we’ve built with Sitebrand.”

Leveraging best industry practices to create smart content

All Sitebrand’s recommendations are based on industry best practices, backed by hundreds of successful implementations in similar industry sectors. This enabled feelbest.com to quickly develop “smart content” for specific customers and product categories. With the Sitebrand solution, specific areas of a Web page are allocated for the strategic placement of ads or campaign messages. Campaigns are developed around various criteria, including geo location, keyword searches, seasonal promotions, product categories, and many others.

Salvaging underperforming segments and sales

Campaigns result in a highly customized and personalized Web experience for all visitors from the moment they land on the Web site. In doing so, online retailers like feelbest.com report immediate and measurable increases in sales lift, superior click through, and higher conversion of existing traffic. “We see an immediate increase in the number of existing visitors converting in the checkout process,” says Pickard. “Seeing success around existing customers in currently established product categories makes us want to leverage Sitebrand to build campaigns around new, underperforming product categories. These new product awareness campaigns will be designed for existing and new customers,” he adds. In this way, feelbest.com will be able to test different offers with respect to new product categories. This ability to raise the profile of lower performing product categories will be designed to help increase average cart spends and total sales.

Close up of 1st-time visitor promo

Close-up of first-time visitor promo

Recognizing a first time visitor has its rewardsTapping into underperforming segments, like first time visitors, has also proved highly successful. The first time visitor needs a different experience than the repeat visitor. They want a feeling of trust. They want to feel reassured they’re on a credible site.

When this first time visitor segment is served personalized messaging that reinforces credibility and trust versus the control group segment that receives no reinforcement, the personalized messaging always sees higher revenue per impression.

In the case of feelbest.com, the revenue per impression lift for personalized first time visitor campaigns is 207% higher than the default control group campaigns with no personalization.

Increased ROI from the feelbest.com e-newsletter

Sitebrand also provided feelbest.com with specific recommendations for print ads and its e-newsletter to create a more holistic and integrated marketing program. The company sends monthly emails to roughly 25,000 opt-in subscribers to promote the e-newsletter. Sales generated from the newsletter had begun to drop. Once the Sitebrand solution was integrated with the email program, feelbest.com saw an increase of 34% in the number of orders received within five days of the newsletter being broadcast. “Whenever we send emails, there’s an instant spike in Website traffic,” says Pickard. “It’s going to get even more interesting when we start adding more automation into the mix.” For an online health and beauty aid store, it will be a highly beneficial to trigger purchase reminder emails, i.e. “Your 90-day supply of vitamins is almost gone. Don’t be disappointed. Buy more now…”

The power of personalization for unique market segments

“The way I see it, not having a personalized approach to online marketing is like calling every one of your customers ‘Bill’. Worse yet, it’s like expecting them all to take advantage of a deal on mint toothpaste. But in reality, your customer’s name might be ‘Susan’ and she wears dentures…” says Pickard. “Website personalization allows you to find these unique market segments so you can serve up relevant offers that will convert visitors to buyers.”

NOTE: This post is also a featured article I contributed to the October 2008 issue of ”Direct Marketing” – a Canadian publication about interactive marketing and sales. Since it’s print-only (odd for an interactive pub, and apparently a website is in the works…but hey!) All that said, I felt compelled to share it online. I hope you enjoyed the read and I welcome your comments!

1 comment Permalink

Why aren’t marketers marketing?

Posted by Kevin Butler October 31, 2008

No first blog is complete without some kind of introduction – but this is no ordinary blog, my fellow readers. As a Sitebrand blogger, I have but one mandate: write rich and compelling stories worthy of your time and subsequent follow up dialog. That’s a hint for any welcome comments below… you know you want to.

Allow me to be the first to say I am new to the world of e-Commerce and internet marketing. I appreciate the experience of those around me and often feed off their wisdom and knowledge, but with all due respect, I’m going to think outside the box here, so don’t act like you aren’t impressed.

Perhaps it’s the youth in me talking, but I’d love to know why marketers aren’t marketing to reflect the times we currently live in? The economy, social media/web browsing, multi-level branding, targeted content to stand out from the clutter of other, general ads… I smell foreshadowing here, mmmKay?

The opportunity for marketers to drill down into audiences via personalization and segmentation is becoming easier and increasingly more available, yet remains as popular as the last X-Files movie (approximately). I see the relationship between analytics and Sitebrand very much in the same vein as the Smoking man – source of information and Mulder – the action and reason behind the data. Bad analogy? Maybe, but I digress.

We rely more and more on analytical data to better understand web traffic and underlying trends, our day to day priorities have us running in multiple directions, yet personalization/optimization never nears the top of that list. Is there a risk we as marketers don’t want to take? Is it a fear of the unknown? Are we still waiting for that TPS report?

Here’s how I look at it: you’ve spent money, time and effort driving web traffic, increasing site awareness and engaging shoppers. You’ve succeeded in building baseline interest from tens of thousands of e-shoppers, so why not speak to those shoppers directly, peaking additional interest based off consumer behaviors and actions? You are 90% of the way towards the sale, yet the remaining 10% means showing the customer the right solution, of the thousands of products and SKUs available on your site. There’s only so much a static message can say to shoppers who are seeking relevant and targeted information. They may not even know it, but you do. Having a web site that dynamically speaks to customers, driving the right content at the right time, all in real time is the key here. With today’s economy struggling more than the latest release of ICQ (seriously, who knew they are up to version 6.0?), why not retain your initial investments and efforts? Driving new traffic to your website may increase your sales, but won’t help conversion rates or other e-Commerce challenges.

“But Kev, dude, these aren’t the droids I’m looking for, what should I get from this blog?” Glad you asked; I have a challenge for anyone doubting my message: Request a Sitebrand consult and we’ll show you the power of behavioral marketing and segment specific marketing strategies.

A quick recap: if Personalization isn’t on your laser guided radar, maybe it should be – start looking at it as a viable way to reinforce your investments and initiatives with slants of pop culture thrown at you (via my blogs, so in the famous words of Apu, please come again). If that doesn’t put a smile on your face like an office Hawaiian shirt day, nothing will.

3 comments Permalink

At Sitebrand we’re always publishing new case studies around classic e-commerce challenges associated with low conversion rates, high shopping cart abandonment rates, low average order sizes, high bounce rates, low return visitor rates, market segmentation and so on.

In our most recent case study, we dug into life online at BBCrafts.com – a leading retail and wholesale company for craft, wedding and party supplies. Sounds fun already, doesn’t it! Even though we’re talking about a very niche website with a decent amount of activity, there were concerns about cart abandonment and low order sizes.  

After approaching many potential personalization and conversion vendors, BBCrafts.com selected Sitebrand because in addition to having a proven personalization platform (Segment&Serve), BBCrafts.com was and is impressed by our consultative approach, aka our Blueprint Success Services. We have a team of pros who help customers optimize their every website move with respect to personalization opportunities.

While high shipping costs are a big reason consumers abandon shopping carts, it’s not the only reason… so BBCrafts decided to do some testing. With respect to reducing shopping cart abandonment, one of the most powerful lessons they learned is that you don’t always have to “give away the farm” using hard incentives and discounts. In some cases all it takes is a bit of reassuring and relevant information – compare this to that friendly in-store assistant at the cash. Presenting this type of reassurance and building consumer trust at the right point in the shopping process (aka the sales funnel) has proven to have significant impact. Call it that little nudge or handshake to go ahead and complete the check-out.

Using an a/b testing type approach, BBCrafts.com experimented with two different types of personalization campaigns at the check-out stage. One focused on information security and the fact that BBCrafts.com does not share or store buyer’s credit card information. In this day and age, this is a huge deal for consumers.

A second campaign simply reinforces that BBCrafts.com usually ships orders fast – often within 48 hours.  Of course a default group would see nothing.

The results? Like the headline of this post says – shopping cart abandonment dropped from 85% to 45%…

For more on BBCrafts.com success with website personalization – including how they achieved a 15% increase in average order sizes and a 160% (+) increase in return visitors, read the full case study!

1 comment Permalink

It has been just shy of a year since I started blogging for Sitebrand.  For those of you who have been reading my blog since I started writing over a year ago (my mom and fiancee), and those who have been reading, commenting and emailing, thanks for your support!

Despite having started writing while still part of the sales department, I decided from the outset to have a strong focus on the fundamental principles behind conversion optimization through dialog personalization, and less of a focus on promoting Sitebrand.  The assumption being that if you agree with the concepts behind creating marketing driven dialog with a traffic segment, there is really only one game in town….But I digress.

I am talking about the focus of my blog because it is rare that I get the chance to leave the cube here in Gatineau and go out and talk to practitioners of digital marketing to hear what they currently do and what they want to do when it comes to optimizing visitor outcomes.

Last month Stephane Hamel of Immeria and WASP fame invited our CTO, Falk Gottlob, and myself to attend a Web Analytics Wednesday event in Montreal.  Not a lot of hesitating on my response, and going to Montreal was just icing on the cake.

Falk and I got the chance to have a few cold beers and a few heated debates about the state of analytics and optimization, and met some fantastic people.

So I was both surprised and excited to be invited to come back and be the presenter at the next event, which will take place next week.

Much like my blogging, the emphasis of the presentation will be less on Sitebrand and more on how a marketer can understand a specific traffic segment, and then optimize their experience to increase their goal conversion.

Per my last post, I will be sticking to my current favorite segment, the First Time Visitor, and I am jazzed to see what the questions and responses will be to the talk.

A few important points for those attending: I love questions and Sitebrand is buying the beer.

Looking forward to seeing you in la belle province.

Cheers,

Jim

Click Here to register for this Web Analytics Wednesday event, Oct 15, 2008 @ Le Local

Click Here to learn more about WASP, a must have tool for any practitioner of analytics.

0 comments Permalink

As an analyst for a vendor, I get a question asked all the time that I am sure all vendors and practitioners work with when dealing with their respective HiPPOs (Highest Paid Persons Opinion – An acronym I use fondly).

“How can I prove your campaigns worked?  Show me a nice clean ROI report in my analytics.”

A good question, and a valid one too.  I wish that analytics technology had been built in such a way that it answered it easily and properly…

As a product that personalizes a web visit, Sitebrand has a profound impact on the conversion rate of a targeted traffic segment.  But what if a given client sends out a huge email blast that touches the segment we are optimizing?  What if they redo the SEO on a number of key pages?  What if they do multivariate testing on a shopping cart page?  Who gets the credit for increased conversions?  

The reporting system in our Segment & Serve product is very strong, and has a series of control groups built in to ensure the highest level of data accuracy.  However, our reports don’t take into account any other work that is being done by the customer outside our product.  And this isn’t a Sitebrand issue: with few exceptions, every other vendor in online marketing software is in the same boat.

In their most recent Web Analytics Buyers Guide, Jupiter Research states that “A resounding 86 percent of analytics clients said attribution measurement capability would be the most beneficial feature for their respective businesses.”

Most of the larger paid analytics vendors have some way of dealing with the attribution issue (Google Analytics does not), but these are still evolving, more abacus – less calculator.  So if I click on two different paid keywords for company XYZ.com over my first three visits, and then click on an internal marketing message en route to a purchase, the marketer might get some visibility into those three things in regards to my conversion.  But which was the most important?  Tough stuff.

I wanted to bring up the attribution issue for two reasons.  The first reason is that it drives me nuts, and I felt like sharing.  The second is because the concept of attribution speaks directly to one of the core themes of my blogs.  Technology will not save a marketer with a weak plan.  If you know your web numbers and have confidence in them, you can build a plan to effect significant and transparent change.

Cheers,

Jim

PS. For some nice insight into how attribution works,  check out these great videos by Avinash Kaushik and John Marshall from earlier in the year.

http://www.kaushik.net/avinash/2008/03/standard-metrics-revisited-5-conversion-roi-attribution.html

0 comments Permalink

Sitebrand is teaming up with Marketo for what promises to be a very interesting webinar on Sept 25…
As marketers, we’re all driven by the needs to find leads and convert them. But it’s not always such a simple task….especially when you’re trying to engage with someone who hasn’t even told you their name. And that’s the way it is on websites! But with a little marketing automation and personalization, the game changes.

Get all the details and register for this free e-commerce webinar today!

1 comment Permalink

There has been a bit of concern recently in the analytics community about the new version of Internet Explorer and its potential ability to significantly increase the number of Internet users who delete or block cookies from their browser.

I read this and had a moment of panic.

For those of you who don’t know, it is just about impossible for any web analytics or optimization product to collect historical data without the use of a cookie. Without the cookie, you lose recency, frequency, and historical behavior and conversion information. For any web tool that generates reports, this is a significant loss of data and customer value. For more info on what cookies are, click here.

Why would Microsoft help people to delete information that a multi-billion dollar industry (eCommerce) needs to survive? The answer is a bit too long for this blog, but has to do visitor (and legislator) concern over abuse of personal information, as well as unfounded fears about viruses and spyware.

About a year and a half ago we had a similar fear about IE7, which would set off security alerts for every website which runs third party cookies (advertising cookies). We had to completely change the way we deploy our product to make sure that our cookie would be served as a first party one by each customer. Suffice it to say, it was not a fun transition.

So I started emailing the CTO at Sitebrand, talking to colleagues and reading the WA forum to see what other people think about the potential impact of massive increases in cookie blocking and deletion. Most of the feedback was resoundingly grim…..

Enter Jim Sterne, one of the founders of the WAA. I am going to print his thoughts on the WA forum in their entirely below. I can’t say it any better than he can, and it made me have a ‘eureka moment’: There is nothing creepy about cookies, as long as you earn the right to use them. If your visitors are deleting or blocking your cookies, you have bigger things to worry about than data accuracy.

So worst case scenario, the new version of Internet Explorer increases cookie block and deletion rates from 3% to 30% for your average website. Your cookie deletion rate becomes less of a data accuracy issue and more of a KPI on site value to visitors. It can be monitored, marketed and managed like your bounce rates.

Thinking of cookies this way, as a indicator of visitor engagement rather than a pure technical component of web analytics, is a major departure from current thinking.  It is also the right way to view cookies as we migrate towards analytics/web 2.0

Thanks to Jim for the concise (and funny) reminder that website visitors SHOULD have control, and that we as online marketers create a forum for the best application of that control, i.e. to engage MY website and business instead of my competitors.

Cheers,

Jim

(Jim Sterne Post to WA Forum, Thursday August 21st)

Giving control to customers (visitors) is always the right move. It then places the responsibility on the marketer to offer sufficiently significant value that the customer is willing to exchange personal data.

Level 0 – Cloaking device engaged

View all of our marketing materials

Level 1 – Cloaking turned off – cookies enabled – javascript tags accepted

Configure products

Stock-on-hand viewable

Use of shopping cart

Access to blog

Latest white papers available

Level 2 – Email address

Download screen savers

White paper archive

Ability to comment on blogs

Newsletter

Notification of special deals

Webinars

RSS feeds

Level 3 – Postal address & preferences

Product discounts

Special event invitations

Access to local call center

Member-only webinars

Level 4 – Answer surveys, participate in Advisory Council

Negotiated pricing

Client conferences in Aruba

Level 5 – Reveal most intimate personal details and predilections

Marriage proposal

Level 6 – Vulcan mind-meld

Resistance is futile

2 comments Permalink

For those of you who read DM News, you’ll know they publish a variety of opinion editorial pieces. In this week’s batch, there’s one I wrote and the topic relates to something I want you to weigh in on – it’s called “Keep sales funnel top-of-mind“. And it all ties into the Shop.org’s State of Retailing Online report for 2008 where it reports that online retailers allocate 53% of their marketing dollars to online customer acquisition – driving traffic to a web site or landing page. But when it comes to online customer retention, the marketing spend drops to 21%. This makes one wonder if any effort to engage and convert customers must come out of the remaining 26% of budget??? If that’s the case, we’ve got a big problem in my opinion. 

Read the piece and share your comments and thoughts. Is this disproportionate spend and lack of respect for the sales funnel alarmingly short-sighted or is it acceptable?

PS – Speaking of shop.org, Sitebrand will be exhibiting at the Shop.org Annual Summit in Las Vegas. It’s happening Sept 15-17 and we’ll be at booth 335. If you’re planning to go, let me know as it’s always a pleasure to meet people face-to-face!

2 comments Permalink

A little over a year ago Clare (my better half) was getting ready to buy a new car. I went to a few of the dealerships with her, and at the first place we went to salespeople assumed that because we were a couple and I was the man, I was the one making the decision. Suffice it to say they did not get a deal, and this is an example of bad segmentation that I will tackle another time…

The second place we went to, we got a good salesperson. He lead by asking who was making the decision, asked about budget, and sat down to work his deal. Clare met all the criteria of someone he can sell to. She was in the market for a new car, she had the money to make a purchase, and she was sitting in front of him talking about the Honda Fit (a wicked car btw).

Now I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that the sales director at Ottawa Honda doesn’t sit down once a month and calculate his closed sales metrics based on:
• The population of Ottawa
• Visitors to every Honda dealership in North America
• People who have gone past the dealership on bikes

He looks at his sales metrics based on:
• People who came into the store
• People for whom a car purchase was financially feasible
• People who engaged a Salesperson.

Seems pretty obvious right? Sales 101.

So why do the vast majority of websites calculate their conversion rates against all visitors to their site? Why isn’t conversion a function of the close ratio of people who could be closed at all?

Example: Many eCommerce websites in the United States don’t ship outside the continental United States, and the ones who do tend to make it so complicated it amounts to the same thing. Why do they not calculate their conversion rate against the traffic that originates in either the 50 US States, or the lower 48 that they build their business around?

I spend a lot of time in other people’s data, and I put this thought to the test through a number of analytics accounts in the last week. The changes in conversion rates are profound when you look at the percentage of prospective customers who convert instead of the percentage of all visitors who convert.

Separating the wheat from the chaff will not only provide clarity into your actual close rate, but will allow you to see opportunity. After you have segmented out the US, you might see that the UK generates 20,000 visits a month but has very low conversion. Perhaps it is time to build a cost-effective and easy UK shipping plan.

It’s not your fault as a marketer if you don’t close any visitors from Ulaanbataar, Mongolia. You don’t ship there. Clean up your conversion reports, and you won’t only make your numbers better (and more transparent), you might find your next major market opportunity.

If enough Ulanbataarians show up, maybe “Spend over $200 and get Free Shipping to Mongolia!” isn’t such a bad idea.

Cheers,

Jim

0 comments Permalink
1 2 3 ... 14